Atheists and Angels!

As Jean MacPhail, author of Spiral Life and scholar, as well as a former fellow at Harvard Neuropathology, observed: My personal spiritual-psychic experiences are "unique" - in part because the precognitive experiences relate to political events outside myself, as well as the fact that a number of them (over a dozen) are documented (mostly via emails). On top of that, the interpretations of my experiences are very consistent - as well as all are very reasonable interpretations. The consistency is due to almost all being "perceptions of threats to the group" parallel to animal alarm calls. I would highlight the fact that one aspect of old testament prophecy is perceptions of foreign (and internal) threats tot he group. Briefly I would mention I have gotten some direct support from Dr. P. Wong as well as support from Dr. S Farra [both Christian psychologists].

Scientific Laboratory Experiments (Successful) of Precognition

The psychologists, Dean Radin and Daryl Bem, both argue vigorously that instinctual processes are involved with many spiritual-psychic experiences. Daryl Bem's precognition experiments have been performed a large number of times resulting in repeated successful precognition experiments, even though the experiments had different designs. Of the various designs, Daryl Bem's experimental design which focused on precognition of sexual stimuli, by far, outperformed all other experimental designs. An article summarizing a Meta-analysis of Bem's widely reproduced experiments stated that "The complete database comprises 90 experiments conducted between 2001 and 2013. These originated in 33 different laboratories located in 14 countries and involved 12,406 participants." (1.) And went on to say, that by far Daryl Bem's best performing design was 'the precognitive detection of erotic stimuli' (1.)

Perspective

 I would highlight the fact that the pivotal October 18, 1981 notarized warning (with a FOIPA stamp) to the FBI about the impending attack by the weathermen terrorist group is very detailed with some unique characteristics.  Some [accurate] details are: group, fabricating bombs, money, woman, 22 were assembled, New York, death, as well as the weathermen terrorist manifesto. of being the only one about terrorism (until 9/11), with a definite "place" as well as "timing" (verbally). I have done my due diligence and I can safely say that comparatively speaking - historically, it is literally unprecedented in accuracy and number of details compared to other "historically documented illustrations."

Perspective: Historically Documented Predictions and Warnings of Assassinations (threats to the group)

While, "psychic" warnings or predictions of assassinations are the only truly consistent type of Historically documented illustrations - across the centuries there are only a limited number of documented illustrations of predictions of deaths of leaders or assassinations: 

1. The assassination of President John Kennedy: Jeane Dixon tried to warn JFK through a DC socialite who had been on his inauguration committee. This is documented only because one of her biographers interviewed the socialite.

2. The assassination of Julius Caesar, whose assassination was predicted by a seer-high priest as well as in his wife's bloody nightmare the night before his assassination, which is historically documented.

3. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln who had a nightmare about his own assassination in which he had dreamed that he saw his casket lying in state in the White House. It is historically documented because he told his cabinet about it a short time before he was assassinated. 

4. Catholic Saint Liguori, who went into a coma as his leader, the pope was on his death bed. 

5. The assassination of Assyrian King Sennacharib documented as a prophecy in the Old Testament

6. My own notarized, precognitive “What a nightmare” warning to the FBI about the terrorist group the Weathermen (now actually the Weather Underground) as well as my verbal warning to the FBI of the impending assassination attempt of President Reagan).

7. Nostradamus' famous quatrain 35 that purportedly related to the death of a French king at a jousting tournament, while talked about in letters of ambassadors to France, is now argued by scholars to have been first published after the event of the French King's death, so I can't really use it as a "documented" illustration.

The fact of the matter is that when I walked into the FBI office on October 18, 1981 with a notarized, written, very detailed precognitive-spiritual warning-prediction, consciously my views were actually very antagonistic to spiritual-psychic experiences. If you think about it - the miracle of the "What a nightmare-Mustard Seed" warning is that I walked into the FBI office and walked out without a net being thrown over me and being hauled off to the looney-bin.

 The Events of fall 1980 through October 1981: What a nightmare

Human reason has this peculiar fate that in one species of its knowledge it is burdened by questions which, as prescribed by the very nature of reason itself, it is not able to ignore, but which, as transcending all its powers, it is also not able to answer. - Kant

How I found The French Quarter in the Holiday Inn in Perrysburg, Ohio is something of a mystery. The French Quarter is a mini-bar tucked back into the interior of the hotel beside the swimming pool. In the fall of 1980, I was in the middle of a divorce and needed to think some things through. At the bar there were, perhaps, room enough for five or six chairs. The chairs were really in truth just high standing stools since the bar top was raised. There were steel rungs that were there for customers feet. Otherwise, their feet would be dangling in mid-air being unable to reach the ground. I was thirty in 1981 and I was going through a divorce at the time with my first wife. I took a liking to the bartender, TJ, and being a bit lonely, I was a frequent customer at the French Quarter. TJ stood about 5’6” with brunette hair that came down to her shoulder. TJ was pretty and had an attractive quirky kind of smile. The one corner of her mouth would tip slightly down while she looked at you quizzically with furrowed brows. 

She was a nice mid-west Ohio girl - with no secrets or hidden agenda. She was about 18 at the time and planned to attend Bowling Green University - a short drive from Perrysburg - that coming fall. I’m sure she thought I was hitting on her, but the truth was I didn’t know what I was doing. I had no idea. I had quit my job and left my wife. I didn’t have any ulterior designs on her. I just wanted someone to talk to, perhaps as if to reassure myself that, in reality, I do really exist after all. We did end up going out on a couple of dates – a movie and a dinner. She had her feet on the ground and she had set in her mind what she was going to do. Most of the time she was busy serving customers, but we did talk from time to time – mostly a lot about nothing in particular. I’ve always had a somewhat cynical political awareness, and we talked about politics a bit. Of course, Reagan was discussed, though I must say, TJ didn’t seem to have any views one way or the other.

Then one day it happened. I’m not sure what I was thinking, but out of the blue, I impulsively TJ that I thought Reagan would get shot. It is strange, my memories about that are like the shards left over from a shattered glass. Yet, I was strangely deeply upset about that conversation. At that particular moment in time I definitely did not believe in psychic. In fact, I had very strong feelings and beliefs that psychic, spirituality, and religion were superstitious nonsense and really, in truth, ignorant. But, it was something that bothered me.

So, I ended up calling the FBI office in Toledo, Ohio. The FBI agent who answered the phone, of course, immediately informed me, in a rather condescending tone, that I should call the Secret Service. That idea didn’t seem very attractive to me. The FBI agent asked my name and address. Then he took me by complete surprise. He asked me when I thought this would happen. That’s a very natural question, but I simply hadn’t thought things through at all. I believe I said that this would take place in a couple of weeks. I didn’t write anything down or take notes. After all, at the time, I definitely consciously did not believe in spirituality-psychic, so there was no real reason to write any of that down. The bottom line is that I have no idea if the timing was correct or not.

In psychology, global-meaning-shattering events – or in plain talk, really hard-hitting traumatic events - are more often associated with cancer or some other dreadful disease. While foretelling President Reagan would get shot didn’t utterly destroy my understanding of the world and the universe, it certainly put some cracks in the foundation, and it shook me to the core. At first, it was like seeing something through a thick fog. There were ‘things’ that were there. You could see the outlines and shapes yet you were left asking whether “it” was really real. Did I really talk to TJ? Did I really talk to the FBI? I tell you though, that the thing about calling the FBI is that you don’t forget the call no matter how hard the mind tries to repress it. To this day I clearly recall the FBI agent telling me that I should have called the Secret Service. In those days it was the doubts – with a capital “D” that were my problem. The doubts were like mental bee stings which made me wince when the thoughts popped into my mind.

And I am a bit OCD, so once I started thinking about it, I wasn’t going to let go. That’s just the way it was.

There was a lot of fear. First I think there was fear of the unknown. “It” was an unknown and if the mind has a rule that would be to make sense out of experiences. So, fear of the unknown was a very real fear to my mind. Then, the experience was totally alien to me so that there was a substantial fear that I had lost my mind. That was a very real fear to me, at that time. Then there was the fear of what other people would think. The experience was what I would call a supercharged experience. Besides doubts and fears there were feelings of guilt and other various and sundry emotions for instance about how to relate to others. It wasn’t until much later that I realized that group-related instincts would seem to make it likely one would have a predisposition to perceive and verbalize threats to the group. But at the time it occurred to me that there might be something wrong with me since it was about violence. The Doubts, Fears, and emotions grew and snowballed - until the experience became a gigantic fireball of emotional torment and turmoil. Then there was the government. I believe people have an innate fear of the government from which I am not immune. The fears and emotions seemed to bleed over into the government aspect and the government became like an Entity which was all-knowing and all-seeing. It was a definite thing in my mind. 

I didn’t say much to TJ though I finally did screw up enough courage to ask her if she remembered me talking to her. To my surprise she said she did remember, but failed to say exactly what she remembered. From my experience I concluded that when an experience which doesn’t ordinarily fit into the world as one understands it, the brain simply has to do something with the experience. The experience of warning about the Reagan assassination created a problem – and it was a problem the brain was going to resolve one way or another. Kant remarked about that very process: “Human reason has this peculiar fate that in one species of its knowledge it is burdened by questions which, as prescribed by the very nature of reason itself, it is not able to ignore, but which, as transcending all its powers, it is also not able to answer. I have therefore found it necessary to deny knowledge in order to make room for faith. (my italics) For me, trying to understand was a peculiar fate, indeed. It took thirty years to fully sort things out.

I did go to a psychologist because I was having a hard time making sense out of everything that was happening to me. I spoke a little bit about my experience. She didn’t comment on anything except to say I should write predictions down. So, I started to do just that. I wrote down a couple of Nostradamus style quatrain-like poems. One that I wrote down was titled “Riddle.” It was about assassination. I wrote down Reagan’s “Ball” but I recall pretty clearly that I debated between putting down “Ball” and writing down “Parade.” It had a lynch pin in it. A few days later, on October 6, 1981, Sadat was assassinated at a victory parade celebrating Egypt’s crossing of the Suez. Islamic radicals had been infuriated when Sadat made peace with Israel in the Sinai treaty, particularly the radical Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Discontent had been fomenting and caused Sadat to round up 1,500 Islamic radicals. A Jihad cell in the military led by Lieutenant Khalid Islambouli was overlooked. During the parade, the assassins jumped out of a truck and opened fire on the grandstand in which Sadat sat. Islambouli succeeded in emptying his assault rifle into Sadat's body. A grenade was also used.

Of course the Riddle of the Sphinx is without question the most famous riddle from antiquity and ancient myth. The Sphinx which terrorized Thebes and killed all who answered her riddle incorrectly asked this riddle: "Which creature has one voice and yet becomes four-footed and two-footed and three-footed?" Oedipus correctly answered the riddle and freed Thebes: Man—who crawls on all fours as a baby, then walks on two feet as an adult, and then uses a walking stick in old age. The sphinx is, of course, an iconic symbol of Egypt. As far as foretelling events the metaphorical meaning of the riddle falls right into the tradition of the Oracle of Delphi and Nostradamus in the use of symbols and allegory, so, in that sense it is fair game. What makes it doubly symbolic is that the Riddle of the Sphinx centers on Oedipus (in the Greek classic Oedipus Rex). And the story of Oedipus is a story about a prophecy – a prophecy/prediction that Oedipus would murder his father and got to bed with his mother. So, The Riddle of the Sphinx had a double meaning in predicting an assassination. I count “parade” because I clearly remember thinking about “parade” and debating whether I should use it. The lynch pin would represent the grenade since grenades have lynch pins. While the “Riddle” is interesting, I, personally, don’t truly count the “Riddle” as a prediction. To me, it’ like a “tag.” I had the action – the act of assassination - but I really didn’t have much of anything else. I had a memory of “parade” and lynch pin but that was it.

After Sadat was assassinated, I asked my self: “Why am I making predictions. Making predictions to make predictions simply did not make sense to me. For every action a person does there must be some kind of motivation for that action. The motivation to make predictions to prove foresight just did not seem an adequate reason to me. For me, there had to be a purpose to make a prediction – like to issue a “warning.”

Then, one day. out of the blue, I got a "feeling" that something bad was going to happen – a premonition. So, that night I sat down at a big oak desk that overlooked the Maumee River and wrote out a stream of consciousness. I wrote down anything and everything that came to mind – no matter how stupid it sounded. The doubts and guilts involved in trying to reach a decision as to whether “it” “is” or “is not” had taken a serious toll. The emotional carnage had been pretty acute and I had reached the point at which I just didn’t care one way or the other – just so long as the debate and the agonizing would end. I resolved, since I felt people would be hurt to try to warn the FBI. I recall looking at the “What a nightmare” stream of consciousness and realizing it looked like the rantings of a lunatic. I wasn’t consciously religious in any way, but there were angels, a prophet, exorcism, a nun, Jesus Christ as well as the “mustard seed.” And there were lines about snakes, a jungle, and monkey screams. It had ALL the appearances of being insanity incarnate. Even though the “What a nightmare” warning looked insane and most anyone who read it would think I was off my rocker, that didn’t faze me – at all. I just didn’t care. I had reached the point where the only thing that mattered was to end the Doubts and the torment. It is strange, but in a way, part of me hoped that “What a nightmare” would be wrong. Then it would be over and I wouldn’t have to fool with it anymore – I would realize that I had gone off the deep end and figure out some way to deal with it. It may seem odd, but in retrospect the question of whether it was right or wrong didn’t figure in any way into my thinking or reasoning. For some truly bizarre reason, I simply did not ask that question.

FBI Office, Toledo, Ohio October 18, 1981

That was late at night. The next morning I got my “What a nightmare” stream of consciousness notarized, and decided to go into the Toledo FBI office to go over it with an agent. The FBI office was in a newly renovated older brick building that stood above the muddy waters of the Maumee River. You have to understand that one of the most notable characteristics of Toledo, Ohio is that nothing notable ever seems to happen in Toledo. So, for the FBI agents in Toledo I wouldn’t think it would be a pressure cooker situation. The building had high ceilings and as I walked down the seeming endless hallway to the FBI office my footsteps echoed hollowly in the empty passageway. As I walked past my mother’s office I noticed her office was closed at that moment. I opened the outer door to the FBI office and stepped into an inner foyer type room. I went to the half glass door and pushed the door-bell button. A minute or two passed and a FBI agent came to the window beside the door. He asked what I wanted and without hesitation I answered, “I have information about a terrorist attack. The agent raised his left eyebrow just enough to let me know I had gotten his attention.

He came out and led me to one of the doors bordering the foyer. The agent was probably about 6’ 1” or 6’ 2” tall. His blue suit was impeccably buttoned by one button and his shoes were polished. Besides being a FBI agent which carried its own reputation, the man was built like a football fullback. He was quite intimidating. The door the agent opened was to a small cubicle. He sat in a chair to a small table with his back to the wall, and I sat in a chair with my back to the door. I told him I had had a dream about terrorism, and I placed my “What a nightmare” stream of consciousness on the tiny table facing the agent. He looked at it intently for what seemed an eternity, though it probably was only a minute, and then the agent looked at me with a very intense but somewhat quizzical look. Even though it was upside down I pointed out the line “A group with money fabricates a terrible bomb.” Then I moved down the stream of consciousness to the line that said, “Security bonds – money – a woman – keys to the whole thing.” Those two lines are the only two lines that could actually be said to be straightforward. I’m not sure how I found those lines so easily when the document was upside down to me. Then I pointed out the line that said, “New York or Miami” and asked him which place he thought it would be. The agent’s head came up and he gave me a sharp glance but paused a moment before speaking. I saw his rather thick neck turn a pretty shade of pink. Then the agent angrily snapped in a loud voice, “How the hell should I know? It’s your dream!” I cringed but said in an even voice, “I believe it will be New York!”

We left the cubicle and the agent paused at the door leading to the office and asked, “What do you think I should do about it?” Had I been on my toes I would have analyzed the puzzle. “Money” is mentioned twice, as well as “security bonds” so one could have reasoned that banks or armored trucks were the target. Had I explained that the agent could perhaps have figured it must be armored trucks. One of the New York Times articles said there had been at least one other Brink’s armored truck robbery. Of course, I possibly could have gone psychic and said “Brink’s” or “armored truck.” In that case the FBI could have warned Brink’s armored truck in New York. They say, “Forewarned is forearmed!” One guard and two policemen were killed and a timely warning could possibly have saved lives.

But the agent’s question was a very intelligent question. In others words he actually toyed with the idea and wondered whether or not it might be true. Personally I suspect he may have been the same agent I talked to when I warned about the Reagan assassination attempt. The reason I think that is because even though the stream of consciousness was totally uninhibited and appeared to be the raving of a madman – after all it said “Satan was there, I spit in that face. (don’t try this at home) – and the agent didn’t blink an eye. The agent didn’t say one single disparaging word or give me a disgusting look – or anything.

I was in a mental fog for several weeks. I saw nothing on the news but I believe it was after three weeks I went to the Toledo Public Library and looked through the New York Times – and I found articles about an event which perfectly matched the “What a nightmare” warning. Two days after I talked to the FBI agent, Katherine Boudin, a former leader of the notorious Weathermen terrorist group (now called Weather Underground), was arrested after a shootout with the Nyack, New York police force which had 22 officers. The shootout resulted after a chase which started with the botched robbery of a Brink’s armored truck. Bomb making materials and plans were found in the terrorists’ apartment. “Fabricating bombs” was an incredibly precise description since none had been made but it looked like they were working on them. The New York Times quoted the Weathermen manifesto: “We are the incubation of your mothers’ worst nightmares.” The “What a nightmare” warning stated “Time is at hand! Time is at hand, and Angels said. “Fight Hard, Die Well! A prophet spoke.” It could be argued that the “Time is at hand” stated twice symbolizes the two policeman who were killed, while the prophet’s statement symbolizes the one Brink’s guard who was killed.

In retrospect, if someone had told me what I was going to do before I did it, I would have thought that person would be out of his mind. I would have told them Charlie Peck simply is not capable of that. Comparatively speaking the amount of detail is incredible. I honestly haven’t found anything like. So, the question, again, is: How can a person who doesn’t believe in spirituality-psychic and actually thinks it is superstition and insanity, write down a stream of consciousness with all that detail, and even though it looks like the ranting and ravings of a lunatic, walk into a FBI office and calmly go over it with a FBI agent? 

October 18,1981

Brief Overview of Genetic Research on Spiritual and Religious Beliefs

Tim Spector, in the article, What Twins Reveal About the Science of Faith (Popular Science, August 8, 2013) states, “They [the researchers] estimated the heritability of spirituality to be around 40 to 50 percent, which is quite high considering how tricky it is to measure. Other U.S. studies using even more detailed questions in larger numbers have found similar or even stronger genetic influences. These studies demonstrate our variable but innate inherited sense of spirituality, which affects how we perceive the world, ourselves and the universe. This is independent of our formal religious beliefs and practices and, strangely, largely independent of family influence.”

Gilbert Todd Vance, in an article, Genetics of Religiosity, states that, “While it may at first appear that religiosity would not be influenced by genes, studies have shown that genetic effects contribute to individual differences in a wide array of traits and behaviors, including social attitudes, personality, vocational interests, IQ, and religiosity.” Furthermore, genetic studies of the hereditability of personality traits, including twin studies, including a large cross-cultural twin study completed in North America, Europe, and Asia by Yamagata S, Suzuki A, Ando J, Ono Y, Kijima N, Yoshimura K, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Livesley WJ, et al. (2006), do strongly suggest that both heritability as well as environmental factors influence personality traits using the five-factor model of personality.

https://www.spirittruthandmeaning.com/mustard-seed

Perspective  

When I finally sat down and thought things over, I came to the conclusion that one needs some kind of good reason or purpose to do something like that (or anything really) - especially something like predictions of the future which minimally would take a great deal of effort psychologically speaking. That is, making predictions to amke predictions didn't make any sense to me - psychologically, biologically, physiologically, or spiritually. Documented psychic phenomena (as well as my early trial and errors) bear that out. Jeane Dixon, Edgar Cayce, and Nostradamus all had a high rate of failures by any reasonable evaluation. 

Edgar Cayce, known as the Sleeping Prophet, when it came to his "earth change" predictions had some massive failures. He had a major "prediction" which was actually a long list of major earth change catastrophes (earthquakes, etc.) that were supposed to happen in 1998. Every single one of them was wrong - including one saying that the entire Island of Japan would fall into the sea. I am not an Edgar Cayce scholar but a definite impression I had from my overview is that Edgar Cayce had a better track record when trying to help individuals than when asked questions about global future events. When giving readings for soldier during WWII many of his "readings" were pretty much on target. I didn't do that research until decades later, but, in retrospect, it does appear that my "read" that one's "purpose" is perhaps the most important aspect or characteristic of spiritual-psychic experiences was correct. I do try to emphasize, at times, that, in my view, it is more important what you do with it than what it is or proving the existence of spirit, God, or psychic.     

One of the factors that makes the "What a nightmare-Mustard Seed" experience such an enigma and a mystery, is that - at first glance - the "What a nightmare" stream of consciousness appears to be the ravings of a madman. Months later, when I looked back and thought it over later, it struck me as actually being pretty bizarre that the FBI agent, who I talked to about my precognitive perception of terrorism, didn’t just throw a net over me and have me hauled away to the local insane asylum. The "What a nightmare" was a completely uninhibited Unconscious stream of consciousness which was loaded to the gills with all sorts of religious and metaphorical symbolism and rhetoric. There were references to "I spit in Satan's face," "angels," "prophets," "exorcism," "nuns," - as well as some Jungian symbolic imagery such as "jungle," "snakes," and "monkey screams." 

I might briefly mention that the weathermen terrorist group involved, which was a splinter group of the Vietnam War era student SDS movement, were communists. "The Jungle" was a socialist classic novel written in 1906 by journalist and novelist Upton Sinclair (1878–1968). The Jungle vividly describes the cruel and inhumane working conditions of immigrants and workers in Chicago. Sinclair's purpose in writing the novel was to expose the ruthless exploitation of workers by capitalists as well as to advance the cause of socialism. Especially in light of a collective consciousness, that might explain all the references to "jungle" imagery. I should highlight that this was the most detailed and "raw" as the remote viewing researcher Russell Targ might say (which he relates tend to be the most detailed) so being totally and completely uninhibited would appear to be a major influence in how What a nightmare turned out as detailed as it did. Of course, I should say, I have no idea where "I spit in Satan's face" came from. All I can think of to say would be: "Don't try this at home!" I should mention that in thinking over why the agent didn't react in a more hostile fashion, it did cross my mind that perhaps the agent I talked to happened to have the same agent I spoke to before Reagan's assassination attempt. 

Things seemed to come to a climax shortly after that in October. On the evening of October 17, 1981, after waking from a nightmare about terrorism of which I had actually very little recollection, I wrote down a stream of consciousness as I sat at my large wooden desk overlooking the muddy and dirty Maumee river. I titled the very wild stream of consciousness, “What a nightmare!” It was completely uninhibited – one of the reasons I believe it turned out as detailed and accurate as it did. 

To understand the story behind the exceptionally detailed notarized Mustard Seed warning to the FBI, it is necessary to understand   the circumstances of my situation back in 1981 are extremely salient - which would include, in this case, political factors. In retrospect - the situation was a ready-made prescription for disaster. Ronald Reagan was President and H. W Bush was vice-president. My father, Ted Peck, at that time a corporate vice-president at Owens Corning Fiberglas, was a classmate of H.W. Bush who was a former CIA Director. Now, politically it wouldn't be likely to want my story to become public because I also am from Phillips Andover Academy as both Bush presidents are. On top of that the CIA Director Casey under President Reagan was, as the writer Woodward pointed out - literally, a paranoid when it came to President Reagan - so in a twisted paranoid mind - the fact that I was form Phillips Andover Academy and had foreknowledge of a presidential assassination, would mean - to them - there was some devious plot with Vice President Bush trying to come to power through the assassination of President Reagan. Of course the fact that I called to warn about the assassination would be an irrelevant point of information and fact to a paranoid. People in National Security are known to have some pretty wacky conspiracy theories from time to time.

The bottom line is that the likelihood of getting any rational or reasonable decision in those circumstances was somewhere between slim to none. In politics, even in ordinary circumstances it is not easy for organizations to reach reasonable conclusions and make rational decisions. Most veterans will tell you that the V.A. has problems. Many employees of agencies will also tell you that institutions have problems. In this situation there was as much of a chance of getting a reasonable decision as a snowball in hell. My read is that it made perfect sense to everyone to "bury" it and pretend it never happened. I believe it would be safe to say I got screwed, blued, and tattooed one hundred times over on my way to Sunday. And what was put into motion back in 1981 is still a problem for me. It would be my guess some of the hacking and other B.S. is a product of that, to be honest. 

The irony of the situation is the "What a nightmare" warning – which, again, is notarized with a FOIPA stamp on it, was the solution – on the face of it - to everybody's problems, as it were. It was so exceptionally detailed that any true analysis would show it had to be precognitive. on October 18, 1981. My "Mustard Seed" or "What a nightmare" notarized (with a FOIPA stamp on it) is an exceptionally detailed and very spiritual precognitive transcendental experience-warning. Some of the details in the precognitive stream of consciousness which turned out to be accurate are: group, fabricating bombs, money, woman, 22 were assembled, New York, death, as well as the title "What a nightmare" matching the weathermen terrorist manifesto. The “22 were assembled for instance, clearly related to the fact that the Weathermen terrorist gang had a shootout with the Nyack police force which the New York Times reported, after two officers were killed “had” 22 officers. Since neither the police nor the leaders of the weathermen “knew” there would be a shootout with the Nyack police force which had 22 officers. 

As a salient point of information: The DOJ-FBI (agent McElwee told me all material goes through the DOJ) has been blowing smoke for years. Despite many letters and requests I can't get anything out of them. As far as I can figure my call to the FBI in 1981 as well as the "What a nightmare document is not in the central indexes. For that reason I feel it necessary to emphasize that the "What a Nightmare" document is notarized with a FOIPA stamp (by sheer chance and coincidence, of course). The "What a nightmare" document has been on display on its page since 2017. Lastly - for the record - the reason walked into the FBI with the my "What a nightmare - Mustard Seed" warning is because after calling the FBI to warn about Hinckley's assassination attempt on Reagan I was fearful of the government (no surprise there) and I wanted to make sure "they" realized it was "psychic." For the record, I connected with Baltimore FBI agent McElwee because my computer got hacked which got exposed by emails from US Senator Van Hollen's. I believe that happened two years - or so - ago. I do actually try to help the best I can, and stay on the good side of the FBI as well, so I send her forecasts or heads up - as best I can.

   Abstract:  October 18, 1981 "Mustard Seed - What a Nightmare" Precognitive Warning!



A Divine Insight: Mustard Seed Parable

What "Makes" the Mustard Seed - What a Nightmare experience was actually the very last line which highlights the Mustard Seed [Parable] - which turned out to be perfect for my particular situation. The Mustard Seed Parable is perhaps the most simple and straightforward of Christ's many parables. Christ's Mustard Seed Parable: Mark 4:30–32:  "How will we liken the Kingdom of God? Or with what parable will we illustrate it? It's like a grain of mustard seed, which, when it is sown in the earth, though it is less than all the seeds that are on the earth, yet when it is sown, grows up, and becomes greater than all the herbs, and puts out great branches, so that the birds of the sky can lodge under its shadow."  

I didn't really grasp the significance and meaning of the Mustard Seed Parable until recently - decades later. In my research into psychology, an important discovery for me is the Synthesis-Consensus of Viktor Frankl, Carl Jung, William James, and Emile Durkheim. Carl Jung, perhaps, stated the synthesis-consensus best, when he stated that "spirit [spiritual processes] give meaning to [his] life!" So, what makes the Mustard Seed parable particularly illuminating insight is that it dovetails perfectly with the synthesis-consensus statement "spirit creates meaning and a sense of reality." Of course, that also dovetails with Christ's statement that "Spirit is Truth" in John 5:6.  Of course this would also tie into Luke 17:21, “The Kingdom of God is within you.” - Which brings into focus Christ's pivotal point about spirit, “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing." (John 6:63).

Historically - for the record - the Mustard Seed Transcendental Spiritual Experience is unprecedented and unrivaled - in documented history. For instance Jeremiah prophesied about the "foe from the north" as well as the 70 year exile (which taken at face value was a couple years off.  Also, time and time again, Jeremiah Prophesied the Fall of Jerusalem and the Jewish people of Judah - as a punishment of God because the Jewish people had broken their covenant with God by worshiping idols. In contrast, the Mustard Seed Experience has 10 details - some of the details are very precise - which in historical documented experiences is unprecedented. Also, for the record, I also argue that the environment has changed dramatically, as well. 

 Reflections and Commentary:

Brief Perspective for the Mustard Seed Prophecy – The Synthesis-Consensus of Frankl, Jung and James

What is most relevant to this essay is that my personal quest for Truth began in 1981 with my exceptionally detailed "What a nightmare - Mustard Seed" warning spiritual epiphany which actually took years to develop and gradually and slowly evolved. It culminated in part due to the "Mustard Seed Parable" in the last line of the pivotal "Mustard Seed" experience in my adapting "spirit and truth" as my guiding lights. John 4: 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.” 

The last line of the (very long) very detailed and historically unprecedented “What a nightmare – Mustard Seed” warning – spiritual epiphany talked referred to the Mustard Seed Parable. The Mustard Seed Parable is exceptionally simply – the tiny “mustard” seed grows into a great Mustard Seed. It is really an analogy for life, creation-creativity, and faith. The Quran has a parallel parable of the mustard seed – as does Hinduism (the Banyan Seed) I didn’t really understand the Mustard Seed parable until I came across the synthesis consensus of Frankl, Jung and James – which – in my view – is necessary for understanding spirituality as swell as religiosity. 

The synthesis consensus of Viktor Frankl, Carl Jung, and William James simply put is that "spirit, spiritual processes, and religious beliefs create meaning, a sense of reality - and ultimately Reality, and Truth. In the anthology, Meaning in Positive and Existential Psychology (2014), Paul Wong, observes: “Frankl considers meaning seeking as stemming from one’s spiritual nature. William James emphasizes in his classic work, originally published in 1902, The Varieties of Religious Experiences: “They [spiritual experiences] determine our vital attitude [sense of reality] as decisively as the vital attitude of lovers is determined by the habitual sense,…” Jung observed, in the Collected Works (CW8: 648 -1968 revised) that “Life and spirit are two powers or necessities between which man is placed. Spirit gives meaning to his life, and the possibility of its greatest development.

For the record: On the synthesis-consensus of Carl Jung, Viktor Frankl, William James and Emile Durkheim, Paul Wong observed that “Your approach is new in the sense of a broad-minded integrative approach, breaking down the artificial traditional divide between science and religious, or scientific psychology versus humanistic or psychoanalytic psychology.” He went on to suggest that a title of “A new integrative approach" would be suitable." Of course, the reason Dr Wong said “new integrative approach is because the Synthesis consensus did not (and still doesn’t exist in mainstream psychology or even in textbooks of the psychology of religion.

It is important to realize - for perspective - at that tiem in my life in 1981 I was - consciously - an atheist when I walked into the FBI with my very detailed "What a nightmare - Mustard Seed" notarized warning tot he FBI. So, - in my situation the Mustard seed parable is critical because it tells how to judge spirituality - not by the accuracy of prediction - it is not what it is, so to speak - but what it does. 

Matthew 7:16-20 

You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.

Separating the wheat form the chaff - brief overview

This is type-written version of the notarized "what a nightmare" hand written copy I walked into the FBI office with on October 18, 1981 – which separates the wheat form the chaff. 

The notarized handwritten page long stream of consciousness which I titled, “Psychic Prediction: What a nightmare” at first glance appears to be the ravings of a madman. In retrospect - only partly tongue in cheek - the real miracle is I walked into an FBI office with that and walked out without having the FBI agent through a net over me and hauling me to the nearest lunatic asylum. There were a lot of lines in the stream of consciousness that would appear to be the irrational ramblings of a lunatic:

Secondly, I should point out that if you take all the lines out with “comes to mind” in it as opposed to a straightforward statement, then rather shockingly, one is left with either straightforward propositional statement or metaphorical expressions. I also removed an over-the-top emotional “vision” of the bomb involved in the terrorist group. Powerful emotions are common in spiritual or spiritual-psychic experiences. For instance, a Turkish man [FB connection], before January 6 – related a dream he had in which America would have an all-out civil war. I asked him for details of the dream and mentioned to him that the perception in dreams and spiritual experiences tends to exaggerate emotions. That being said, the tone, mood, and frame of mind in the “What a nightmare” warning actually identified and mirrored the tone of the Weathermen manifesto which the New York Times quoted as saying.         

                                                               Psychic Prediction: What a nightmare

1.           Prediction has nothing to do with nothing, I pray this is wrong.

2.           A group with money fabricates a terrible bomb;

3.           ***********************[an over-the-top emotional vision of the bomb]

4.           Hopefully very poorly made. Assassin this nightmare began

5.           **************************************** comes to mind

6.           ********************************comes to mind

7.           In a nightmare it came to me that 22 were

8.           assembled against me, I being America,

9.           Such hell this causes me that I asked Sister Fuljenzi

10.         To call an exorcist. For surely I said Satan

11.         Is at hand. Many times I say call the FBI, Secret Service,

12.         the President, Congress, Forewarn them!

13.         Many times I have said “Come talk to me

14.         I have no time!” In this nightmare they

15.         said he is insane; the booby hatch for him!

16.         Like a bat out of hell from the future I flew!

17.         “Call the nuke squad”, I scream. And hopefully I’m insane!

18.         Like someone lost in a steaming jungle I screamed

19.         Monkey screams and snake hiss are the only return.

20.         Security bonds – money – a woman – keys to the whole thing.

21.         Shadow – self-doubt – approaches, saying this might be Quantico.

22.         Near Miss, you said – where? – might be New York or Miami.

23.         Might be Muslim fanatic, might be South America (Spanish)

24.         Fanatic, Might be fantasy!

25.         Yet still such a nightmare, I must record!

26.         Satan was there, I spit in that face

27.         That seemed important too

28.         For surely as insane as this nightmare is

29.         There are people insanely satanic out there, I know

30.         Time is at hand! Time is at hand and angel spoke

31.         Fight Hard; Die Well – a prophet spoke

32.         The Just must persevere – such a chorus of good as

33.         I have never heard; the Faith – the Mustard Seed

34.         It almost seemed that Christ was there

Joseph Kennedy in an airplane full of TNT comes to mind

A near miss, Silver Spring, comes to mind

bad enough that a poorly made nuke comes to mind. [a lot of emotions were expressed]

“Each of us carries a unique spark of the divine,  and each of us is also an inseparable part of the web of life.” - Viktor Frankl

"Spirit is the spark, or portion of the Divine that is in every entity.   Edgar Cayce: documented psychic and spiritual leader - [3744-5]

“The Kingdom of God is within you!" - Luke 17:21 

The Mustard Tree    --- John 3: 8 The wind blows where it wishes. You hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”

I must confess that I can testify to that at some length because, from personal experiences, at times stuff comes at you - in the mind - and I'm not always sure where it came from or what it is about.

Quantum Spirituality: Perspective and Balance!

In a sense, many physicists in acquiring 'knowledge' derived from quantum physics, appears to have come full circle, and modern physicists now have to confront and irresolvable problem and the Paradox of Chaos. Now that modern scientists are now facing the unknowable Unknown, and looked point blank into the abyss and the void, the physicists themselves have seem to think that, perhaps, after all, those prehistoric human beings may not have been completely off base an unrealistic as they have earlier thought. Physicists seem to have learned to put spirituality and religious beliefs in perspective because of how the mind deals with utter chaos and the void.

Neil Bohr's observation about Reality and Truth, in light of discoveries about the "Real" Ultimate Physical Reality which have been made by Quantum Physics, was that as a result of discoveries, "Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real!" The bottom line is that  quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement are beyond the cause and effect of ordinary orthodox physics.  Wolfgang Pauli was careful to make a distinction that “although [particle physics] allows for an acausal form of observation, it actually has no use for the concept of ‘meaning’!” That is, human understanding and comprehension of reality is, likely, in the end only an interpretation. The Nobel prize-winning physicist Brian Josephson, who won the Nobel prize for Quantum tunneling, concluded as a result of his understanding of quantum physicists that precognition and mental telepathy are actual real hypothetical theoretical possibilities. 

Walczak, echoing the physicist Pauli stated: "To do full justice to reality, we must engage it from different perspectives. That is the philosophical principle of complementarity. It is a lesson in humility that quantum theory forces to our attention Complementarity is both a feature of physical reality and a lesson in wisdom. You have to view the world in different ways to do it justice, and the different ways can each be very rich, can each be internally consistent, can each have its own language and rules. But they may be mutually incompatible — and to do full justice to reality, you have to take both of them into account."

Max Planck, a German physicist whose discovery of energy quanta won him the Nobel Prize in 1918. Physics in 1918. Planck’s fame came from his creation of quantum theory and quantum mechanics. Planck came to the conclusion that “consciousness [is] fundamental. [And that] matter is derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

Later Planck observed, “As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”